1st season episode 15
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 11:16 pm
I can't understand a conversation in episode 15 of season 1. A tachikoma is talking to Batou during a live fire exercise for new recruits. The Tachikoma keeps talking about how the major been giving them scaring looks lately and how they've achieved personality.
What I don't understand is the statement about the tachikoma coming to understand the concept of god, and how the concept he's trying to describe is
"different from the concept of zero, there is no way to send the invalid input response when we are told to shut down permanently with no good reason. If that is god in analog, then it's zero in digital, how is that? Well, we're made from advanced digital devices, right? So we've gathered so much information that it can't all be stored in our ghosts. But you analog based people, your ghost isn't damaged no matter how many digital devices are needed to become a cyborg or get a cyberbrain. Furthermore, you can die if you have a ghost. How nice. Anyway, how does it feel to have a ghost?"
This reads like gibberish to me, but I know it has to do with the issues raised by the Tachikomas growing sentience and personality. Can anyone give me the gist of what he's trying to say and its relevance to the above theme?
What I don't understand is the statement about the tachikoma coming to understand the concept of god, and how the concept he's trying to describe is
"different from the concept of zero, there is no way to send the invalid input response when we are told to shut down permanently with no good reason. If that is god in analog, then it's zero in digital, how is that? Well, we're made from advanced digital devices, right? So we've gathered so much information that it can't all be stored in our ghosts. But you analog based people, your ghost isn't damaged no matter how many digital devices are needed to become a cyborg or get a cyberbrain. Furthermore, you can die if you have a ghost. How nice. Anyway, how does it feel to have a ghost?"
This reads like gibberish to me, but I know it has to do with the issues raised by the Tachikomas growing sentience and personality. Can anyone give me the gist of what he's trying to say and its relevance to the above theme?