If not then, well, we could always rename this thread
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Moderator: sonic
I agree it is a pretty big subject all on its own. Technology covers a huge span. Who, what, when and were alone are worth a few hundred postsJeff Georgeson wrote:Is there still interest in this? I'm perfectly happy to set up a new sub-forum about technology. As you said, it will probably dovetail with philosophy, but I think it's sufficiently different to stand on its own.
--Jeff
The Technolgy is pretty much half of the story. What would GitS be without cyberbrains, prostetics and Tachi's. Not to mention all the other stuff that goes on. Your biggest problem is were do you startSaito wrote:Definitely, although I may lose some people here in technobabble and you;d have to tolerate a bit of subject cross over with the philosophy element too, but I am very enthusiastic about discussing the technology behind GiTS - it is after all one of the elements of GiTS I find most fascinating. I have much to say on the subject even myself, even if I might lose everyone else along the way
You're coming in on an old post. There used to be very little moderation and support around here, and at certain times it seemed like this place would go under in a blaze of spam, but all that's changed now that Jeff is back.Proxy wrote:How about a section for real world technology? Saying theres nobody else here to create sub-topics means that nobody moderates this forum? Is there another forum like this about GITS? So far this is the best and most active.
On the note about real world tech, ive been following this story: http://www.news.com/8301-13772_3-987451 ... eekGestalt which is probably old news to some but i think its awesome how cheap its supposed to be. They say its meant for gaming and everything (sounds like its basically a mind controlled hotkey system), but i think it'd be great for all around computing if you got the hang of it.
Sorry if thats a little off topic.